It Took Earth Ten Million Years to Recover from Greatest Mass Extinction

Life was almost wiped out 250 million years ago.Only 10% of plant and animals survived.The recovery from the crisis lasted about 10 million years.There are 2 reasons for the delay of the sheer intensity of the crisis, and countering grim conditions on earth after the first wave of extinction.The Permian crisist was the most damaging crisis for earth.It was triggered by a number of physical environment shocks(global warning,acid rains.ocean acid diffication and ocean anoxia).There was enough to kill 90% of living thing on land and in the sea.It must be really hard to imagine how much life could been killed.Rocks found in China and all over the world prove that this was the biggest crisis ever faced by life.Current research shows that the grim conditions counted in bursts for sune 5-6 million years after the initial crisis, repeated carbon and oxygen crisis,warming and other effects.Some groups of animals on land or sea did recover.They quickly started recovering and rebuilding their ecosystem,but they did suffer further setbacks.Life for them didn't recover in these early phases because permanent ecosystems weren't established yet.As life was getting back to normal than an other crisis hi and the it back,again.The carbon crisis hit many times.Then finally conditions became normal again after 5 million years,more or less.After that more complex ecosystems emerged.Those creatures formed as the basis of future modern style ecosystems.The crisis' that happened of corse weren't good.But the thins that were happening then seem to be happening to us today.We could learn something from what happened and try to prevent it.So that the same thing doesn't happen today for us.


"It Took Earth Ten Million Years to Recover from Greatest Mass Extinction." Science Daily. N.p., n.d. Web. 29 May 2012. <http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/05/120527153810.htm>.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YddIuwHJtQs

Bouys

Where are waves the highest and the lowest? 

I thing the highest waves happen in the Pacific Ocean,because its the biggest ocean.

 What do you think makes them so high?

  Make sure that you note the date you accessed the link.  What types of buoys were they?  What atmospheric pressure or wind speed was at that location?  What causes waves to become so high or low?  Why might these buoys be helpful to meteorologists, cities on the coast (seaside), boatsmen, you...?  

Making Waves Lab

In class we made waves on the laptop and in real life.Making waves on the laptop made me understand better what happens with the waves when the frequency and the amplitude increases.When making waves on the laptop you could rotate the screen and see whats happening on the side which was really helpful and also something i couldn't do when i made it in reality.

We did all sorts of activities with waves.

First we did observations with crock.We had to make drops from the pipe in the middle,corner;with two pipes in the middle,corner,one end;with paper towels,one stick of clay in the center,clay in a different position,two stick of clay end to end,different position, and two and a half stick of clay.

Second, we did the same things but with cork.

The good thins about the reality lab we did is that you could see better from a birds eye view.You could see how almost every time the waves bounced back from the plastic.

When you have more amplitude the drop is heavier so it makes more waves.i thing when you have more frequency that the drop is a little lighter and it doesn't make really high waves but they last longer.

New Mechanism of Past Global Warming? Thawing Permafrost 50 Million Years Ago Led to Global Warming Events

New studies were reported in nature.Climate scientists proposed a new necluanism that can explain the source of carbon that fed a series of extreme warning evens 55 million years ago.Plus a couple of other similar,smaller warning events after that.
The standard hypothesis has been that the source of carbon was in the ocean.In a from of froze methane gas in the ocean floor sediments.
Instead of that,the scientists are aseribing  the carbon source the the continents.In polar latitudes where permafrost can store massive amounts of carbon that can be realizes as CO2 when the permafrost thaws.
This is supported by calculations estimating interactions of variables like greenhouse gas levels,changes in Earth's tilt and orbit,ancient distributions of vegetation's and Gabon stored in rock and in frozen soil.
While the amounts of carbon involved in the ancient soil and how scenarios was much grater than today.Implications of the study appear dire for the long term future as poor permafrost carbon deposited have begun to thaw due to burning fossil-flues.
Similar things are happening today.Global warming is degrading permafrost in the north polar regions, thawing of frozen organic matter.Which will decay to realization man-thane the atmosphere.This will exaprate future warming in a positive feedback loop.
The Earth's atmospheric temperature is a result of energy input from the sun,minus what escapes back to space.
Save the Earth.Because while saving it we are saving our self's.

"New Mechanism of Past Global Warming? Thawing Permafrost 50 Million Years Ago Led to Global Warming 

     Events." Science Daily. N.p., n.d. Web. 8 Apr. 2012. <http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/ 

     2012/04/120404133801.htm>. 

Galaxy Formation + Evolution

Formation of galaxy is still one of the most active research areas in astrophysics and this is also true for galaxy.Some ideas are still not widely accepted.Most accepted view today is that all structures we observe today was formed as a consequence of the growth of primary fluctuations.
Primary fluctuations causes gas to be attracted to areas of denser material,and star clusters and stars.
Consequence of this model is that the location of galaxies indicates areas of higher density of the early universe.Even the distribution of galaxies is closely related to the physics of the early universe.
This topic is really interesting and i really do want to know what there is in the galaxy.

"Galaxy formation and evolution." Sciencedaily. N.p., n.d. Web. 14 Mar. 2012. 

     <http://www.sciencedaily.com/articles/g/galaxy_formation_and_evolution.htm>. 

Discovery of Brain's Natural Resistance to Drugs May Offer Clues to Treating Addiction

An injection of cocaion or any other type of drugs causes mice to stop the neurons that generate sensations of plesure.These cellular changes last for a week.Findings suggest this powerful reaction to the drug may be a protective anti-addiction response.Scientists theories that its possible to mimic this responses to treat this addiction to this drug and perhaps other bu t they need to research more and do more experiments.Scientists were amazed that one exposure to these drugs could promote a really strong response that lasts a week even after the drug leaves the body.They believe that this could be the brains immediate response to reverse simulation to these drugs.

So technically when the brain knows that drug entered the body the brain tries to fight it or defend its self.

But the scientists are still trying to understand better the brains response to drugs.Why?They're hoping to find a way to prevent it and tread addiction.Also they're doing this because a lot of people died because of drugs.In 2009 more than 37,000 people died because of drug abuse.

Scientists are researching cellular changes to the brain that occur while taking drugs.

Heres what happens after using drugs for a couple of years.

While i was living in Novi Sad at night sometimes even during the day drug dealers and drug addicts would try to get in.One day when my dad was coming back home from work he saw a syringe  and while he was getting into and out of the lift there was blood on the walls,floor,everywhere.

I think that this what scientist are doing is really important and good fro the society.Drugs don't make you feel good or better they just help you die quicker.

For all we know some of our friends even family could be addicted.We are not aware how much people are on drugs and we probably don't even know how much this project will help.

"Discovery of Brain's Natural Resistance to Drugs May Offer Clues to Treating Addiction." Science 

     Daily. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Mar. 2012. <http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/03/ 

     120308101625.htm>.

Seasons

1.When its winter in the Northern Hemisphere,which areas on Earth get the most concentrated light?Which areas get the most consecrated light when it is summer in the Northern Hemisphere?
2.Compare your observation of how the light hits the area halfway between the equator and the North pole during winter and during summer.
3.if the squares project on the ball from the acetate become larger,what can you infer about the amount of heat distributed in each square?
4.

Seasons Observation

Observation:                                    What causes the seasons?


My partner and i did this project in class where wer observing the seasons.How do we get different seasons?
We got a poam ball,a tooth pick,stickl,flashlight  and a grid.We put the stick into the foam ball drove the equator and put it on the toutractor for 23.5 degrese.After we took the flash light and wile pointing it to the Earth we put the grid lines infround.

We realized that the North and South pol are always cold because the Suns raze almost never touches it so because it has no sun its always cold
.
When the sun is on the Northern heme sphere its summer there while on the southern heme sphere its winter.When on the Southern heme sphere is summer on the northern heme sphere  its winter.

Grid lines
in the equator the boxes are more like boxes but at the poles they are rectangles. That means that the poles get less sun light.

tooth pick shadow
summer-in summer the shadow is bigger because the north pole gets more light from the sun
winter- the shadow is very short because the bottom axis is gettting all of teh light
rotation-moves like a clock

Green House Gases

This week in school we have been working on a really cool project.We got to chose what we wanted to do.Our teacher gave us some really cool ideas.One of them was to put over one jar aluminium and pone a small whole just so a straw can go in and so we can mix up oxygen and carbon dioxide,in the other jar we would have just oxygen and over it aluminium.Ofcorse we would put thermometers in both of them and see what would happen.There was a similar idea for plastic bags.My partner and i wanted to to something with jars,but not the idea that miss M.gave us.We took two jars,in the first one we pored water about half a jar,put a termometer, and tin foil over it so that no air can escape.The other jar was filed with normal air and on top of it was,also tin foil.After only 10minutes the first jar(with water) started to for.

Temperature started with jar 1(with water):20

Temperature started with jar 2(with normal air):20

After 30 minutes we have come to the result that only the jar with water changed the temperature and the jar with the normal air didn't.

Temperature started with jar number 1(with water):28

Temperature started with jar number 2(with normal air):20

We did this project to see if the green house effect worked in two jar one with water and the other one with normal air but both of them covered with tin foil.

Learning Disability

Learning disability is a neurological condition that affects a persons potability to communicate and potential to be taught effectively.Learning disability includes such conditions:

•  Dysgraphia-writing disorder
• Dyslexia- reading disorder
• Dyscalculia-mathematics disorder
• Developmental Aphasia.

In the U.K. the learning disability is used more for developmental disability.When someone has a learning disability it doesn't mean that he has low or high intelligence,or any innate inability.It just means for them learning is harder and it takes them more time but they can some how learn it.

You can learn more about learning disability herehttp://www.sciencedaily.com/articles/l/learning_disability.htm

I also found this could video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GoM5HcfQBwE this video made me understand better what is it really.

Last Universal Common Ancestor More Complex Than Previously Thought

 Scientists call it LUCA, the Last Universal Common Ancestor, but they don't know much about this great-grandparent of all living things. Many believe LUCA was little more than a crude assemblage of molecular parts, a chemical soup out of which evolution gradually constructed more complex forms. Some scientists still debate whether it was even a cell.New evidence suggests that LUCA was a sophisticated organism after all, with a complex structure recognizable as a cell, researchers report. Their study appears in the journal Biology Direct.

The study builds on several years of research into a once-overlooked feature of microbial cells, a region with a high concentration of polyphosphate, a type of energy currency in cells. Researchers report that this polyphosphate storage site actually represents the first known universal organelle, a structure once thought to be absent from bacteria and their distantly related microbial cousins, the archaea. This organelle, the evidence indicates, is present in the three domains of life: bacteria, archaea and eukaryotes (plants, animals, fungi, algae and everything else).

The existence of an organelle in bacteria goes against the traditional definition of these organisms, said University of Illinois crop sciences professor Manfredo Seufferheld, who led the study.

"It was a dogma of microbiology that organelles weren't present in bacteria," he said. But in 2003 in a paper in the Journal of Biological Chemistry, Seufferheld and colleagues showed that the polyphosphate storage structure in bacteria (they analyzed an agrobacterium) was physically, chemically and functionally the same as an organelle called an acidocalcisome (uh-SID-oh-KAL-sih-zohm) found in many single-celled eukaryotes.

Their findings, the authors wrote, "suggest that acidocalcisomes arose before the prokaryotic (bacterial) and eukaryotic lineages diverged." The new study suggests that the origins of the organelle are even more ancient.

The study tracks the evolutionary history of a protein enzyme (called a vacuolar proton pyrophosphatase, or V-H+PPase) that is common in the acidocalcisomes of eukaryotic and bacterial cells. (Archaea also contain the enzyme and a structure with the same physical and chemical properties as an acidocalcisome, the researchers report.)

By comparing the sequences of the V-H+PPase genes from hundreds of organisms representing the three domains of life, the team constructed a "family tree" that showed how different versions of the enzyme in different organisms were related. That tree was similar in broad detail to the universal tree of life created from an analysis of hundreds of genes. This indicates, the researchers said, that the V-H+PPase enzyme and the acidocalcisome it serves are very ancient, dating back to the LUCA, before the three main branches of the tree of life appeared.

"There are many possible scenarios that could explain this, but the best, the most parsimonious, the most likely would be that you had already the enzyme even before diversification started on Earth," said study co-author Gustavo Caetano-Anollés, a professor of crop sciences and an affiliate of the Institute for Genomic Biology at Illinois. "The protein was there to begin with and was then inherited into all emerging lineages."

"This is the only organelle to our knowledge now that is common to eukaryotes, that is common to bacteria and that is most likely common to archaea," Seufferheld said. "It is the only one that is universal."

The study lends support to a hypothesis that LUCA may have been more complex even than the simplest organisms alive today, said James Whitfield, a professor of entomology at Illinois and a co-author on the study.

"You can't assume that the whole story of life is just building and assembling things," Whitfield said. "Some have argued that the reason that bacteria are so simple is because they have to live in extreme environments and they have to reproduce extremely quickly. So they may actually be reduced versions of what was there originally. According to this view, they've become streamlined genetically and structurally from what they originally were like. We may have underestimated how complex this common ancestor actually was."

The National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the National Science Foundation provided funding for this study.

The study team also included Kyung Mo Kim, of the Korea Research Institute of Bioscience and Biotechnology; and Alejandro Valerio, of the Museum of Biological Diversity in Columbus, Ohio.

What might have been in Earth's ancient 'chemical soup'? Scientists don't know much about LUCA, the Last Universal Common Ancestor, the great-grandparent of all living things. Many believe LUCA was little more than a crude assemblage of molecular parts, a chemical soup out of which evolution gradually constructed more complex forms. New evidence suggests that LUCA was a sophisticated organism, with a complex structure recognizable as a cell.

Measuring Global Photosynthesis Rate: Earth's Plant Life 'Recycles' Carbon Dioxide Faster Than Previously Estimated

A Scripps Institution of Oceanography at UC San Diego-led research team followed the path of oxygen atoms on carbon dioxide molecules during photosynthesis to create a new way of measuring the efficiency of the world's plant life. A team led by postdoctoral researcher Lisa Welp considered the oxygen atoms contained in the carbon dioxide taken up by plants during photosynthesis. The ratio of two oxygen isotopes in carbon dioxide told researchers how long the CO₂ had been in the atmosphere and how fast it had passed through plants. From this, they estimated that the global rate of photosynthesis is about 25 percent faster than thought. The authors of the study, published in the journal Nature, said the new estimate of the rate of global photosynthesis enabled by their method will in turn help guide other estimates of plant activity such as the capacity of forests and crops to grow. Understanding such variables is becoming increasingly important to scientists and policymakers attempting to understand the potential changes to ecosystems that can be expected from global warming.

Click here is the link where i got it from http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/09/110928222003.htm

Aboriginal Australians: The First Explorers

 In an exciting development, an international team of researchers has, for the first time, pieced together the human genome from an Aboriginal Australian.

The results, published in the journalScience, re-interpret the prehistory of our species.

By sequencing the genome, the researchers demonstrate that Aboriginal Australians descend directly from an early human expansion into Asia that took place some 70,000 years ago, at least 24,000 years before the population movements that gave rise to present-day Europeans and Asians. The results imply that modern day Aboriginal Australians are in fact the direct descendents of the first people who arrived in Australia as early as 50,000 years ago.

The study derived from a lock of hair donated to a British anthropologist by an Aboriginal man from the Goldfields region of Western Australia in the early 20th century. One hundred years later, researchers have isolated DNA from this same hair, using it to explore the genetics of the first Australians and to provide insights into how humans first dispersed across the globe.

Separation

The genome, shown to have no genetic input from modern European Australians, reveals that the ancestors of the Aboriginal man separated from the ancestors of other human populations some 64-75,000 years ago. Aboriginal Australians therefore descend directly from the earliest modern explorers, people who migrated into Asia before finally reaching Australia about 50,000 years ago. In showing this, the study establishes Aboriginal Australians as the population with the longest association with the land on which they live today. This research is presented with the full endorsement of the Goldfields Land and Sea Council, the organization that represents the Aboriginal traditional owners for the region.

New model for migration

The history of Aboriginal Australians plays a key role in understanding the dispersal of the first humans to leave Africa. Archaeological evidence establishes modern human presence in Australia by about 50,000 years ago, but this study re-writes the story of their journey there.

Previously, the most widely accepted theory was that all modern humans derive from a single out-of-Africa migration wave into Europe, Asia, and Australia. In that model, the first Australians would have branched off from an Asian population, already separated from the ancestors of Europeans. However, this study shows that when ancestral Aboriginal Australians began their private journey, the ancestors of Asians and Europeans had not yet differentiated from each other. Once they did, some 24,000 years after the first Australians had begun their explorations, Asians and remnants of the ancestral Australians intermixed for a period of time.

Click here:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/09/110922141858.htm

Scientists Take First Step Towards Creating 'Inorganic Life'

Professor Lee Cronin and his team have demonstrated a new way of making inorganic-chemical-cells or iCHELLs.The profesor said that alomst all of the life on earth is based on organic biology,but the inorganic world is considered to be inanimate. 
They are trying to create self-replicating, evolving inorganic cells that would essentially be alive.The cells can be compartmentalised by creating internal membranes that control the passage of materials and energy through them, meaning several chemical processes can be isolated within the same cell just like biological cells.
Its still a work in progress

Summer with science ( London)

For teh summer i went to London! It was really fun i got to see a lot of stuff with friends and have fun.The most amazing thing and the thing ill alwayes remember is my ride on the London Eye!It was really cool.You could see the whole London,even the top of Big Ben when your on top!The science part was the part when your going up because your going oposite the earths gravity and when your going down because your going the way the earth gravity is pulling you.There is a part when your on top and your normal because you don't feel like the earths gravity is pulling you that much because your like on a straight line.But i think that the rife wouldn't be so cool if it wasn't for my awesome friends! 

My new blog

My name is Kristina and this is my new science blog!